The United States Supreme Court has granted consolidated review of three cases to determine whether arbitration agreements that waive employees’ rights to participate in a class action lawsuit against their employer are unlawful. The Court’s decision to address the uncertainty surrounding class action waivers of employment claims follows a circuit split last year in which the Fifth and Eighth circuits upheld such waivers and the Seventh and Ninth circuits found that such waivers violate the National Labor Relations Act. Given the increasingly widespread use of class action waivers by employers to stem costly class and collective actions, the high court’s ruling is likely to have a significant nationwide impact.
Continue Reading Supreme Court Will Rule On Legality of Class Action Waivers in Employer Arbitration Agreements
AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion
Ninth Circuit holds PAGA Waiver Provisions are Unenforceable
The Ninth Circuit ruled on Monday, September 28, that California Private Attorney General Act claims cannot be waived in employment arbitration agreements, following the rule announced by the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014).
Continue Reading Ninth Circuit holds PAGA Waiver Provisions are Unenforceable
California Legislators Move Forward on a Bill Prohibiting Binding Arbitration as a Condition of Employment
For many employers and employees, arbitration is a quicker and less costly means of resolving employment-related disputes. As a result, it has become standard practice for many employers to require as a condition of employment that employees agree to arbitrate employment-related claims. Mandatory arbitration clauses are routinely found in employment agreements or given to employees as separate employment policies at the time of hire or during their employment.
…
Continue Reading California Legislators Move Forward on a Bill Prohibiting Binding Arbitration as a Condition of Employment
PAGA Claims Survive Class Action Waiver Challenge – Again
The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Monday to take up a challenge to the California Supreme Court’s holding that California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims cannot be waived in employment arbitration agreements containing a class action waiver.
Continue Reading PAGA Claims Survive Class Action Waiver Challenge – Again
California Supreme Court Ruling in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation: Class Waivers Revisited
On June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court announced a landmark ruling that arbitration agreements with mandatory class waivers are generally enforceable while carving out one notable exception. That exception consists of representative claims brought under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) which is unique to California.…
Fifth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Class Arbitration Stance
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down a significant ruling in the continuing conflict over the ability of employers to require employees to arbitrate employment disputes and to waive the right to class arbitration.
Continue Reading Fifth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Class Arbitration Stance
Key United States Supreme Court Decisions Affecting Labor and Employment for the 2012-2013 Term
EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS
Vance v. Ball State University: Narrow Definition of Supervisor in Harassment Suits
In Vance, the Supreme Court announced a narrow standard for determining which employees constitute “supervisors” for purposes of establishing vicarious liability under Title VII. In a 5-4 decision, the Court decided that a supervisor is a person authorized to take “tangible…
Supreme Court Delivers Another Arbitration Victory For Employers But Challenges Remain
Last week, in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-3 ruling, reversed the Second Circuit and held that a contractual waiver of class arbitration is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) even if the cost of proving an individual claim in arbitration exceeds the potential recovery. In holding that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement is enforceable, even as to federal anti-trust claims, this decision builds upon the trend set in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010), AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), and CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, 132 S. Ct. 665 (2012) – that arbitration agreements should be enforced according to their terms even for claims under federal statutes.…
Arbitrator Has Authority To Determine Enforcement Of Non-Compete Clauses, Not State Court – US Supreme Court Rules
Arbitration provisions are increasingly a focus in non-competition litigation these days and are being used in a variety of strategic ways to assist with the enforcement of non-competition clauses. The United States Supreme Court recently held that an arbitrator, not a state court, should have decided the enforcement of non-competition clauses. The employer filed for…
Class Action Waivers In Employment Arbitration Agreements Found Enforceable By California Court Of Appeal
On June 4, 2012, the California Court of Appeal held that class-action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). In Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC, the appeal court affirmed an order to compel arbitration of wage-and-hour claims in light of the 2011 United States Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. As a result, Iskanian provides employers with the necessary ammunition to argue for the enforceability of employment contract provisions providing for arbitration of claims and waiver of class-action lawsuits.…