The combination of a quirky procedural posture and broad language used by the Supreme Court in 1941 have left Home Depot trapped in a North Carolina state court defending against a class action, despite the removal provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act. On September 27, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether CAFA authorizes removal of class action counterclaims when its requirements are otherwise met.
Continue Reading Supreme Court to Address CAFA Removal of Counterclaims
Anna P. Lazarus
Eleventh Circuit Expands the FLSA’s Handling Clause
After the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in Asalde v. First Class Parking Systems LLC 894 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2018), more small employers may be subject to the requirements of the FLSA. By expanding the “handling clause,” the case chips away at the degree of interstate commerce necessary for the FLSA to apply.
Continue Reading Eleventh Circuit Expands the FLSA’s Handling Clause
Who’s Invited to the Party?: The Status of Collective Action Opt-Ins
Andrea Mickles filed a complaint against her employer Country Club Inc., alleging it had violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by improperly classifying her and other employees as independent contractors and failing to pay them minimum wage and overtime. She filed her case as a collective action, and others opted into the case before any ruling on conditional certification. …
Continue Reading Who’s Invited to the Party?: The Status of Collective Action Opt-Ins
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Case Addressing Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Class Actions
On March 26, 2018, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Resh v. China Agritech, Inc., a case that could have far-reaching implications in the class action context. Resh addresses the interplay of successive class actions and the statute of limitations, specifically, whether a plaintiff can pursue a class action after the statute of limitations has run. Although the issue arose in a securities case, the Court’s ruling will affect class actions and time bars in all areas, including employment. …
Continue Reading Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Case Addressing Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Class Actions
Florida Legislation Establishes That Ride-Sharing Drivers Are Independent Contractors, Not Employees
The issue of whether workers are properly classified as independent contractors rather than employees is a common dispute in the gig economy, particularly in newer, technology-based industries, such as ride-sharing. That issue just became a much simpler one in Florida.
Continue Reading Florida Legislation Establishes That Ride-Sharing Drivers Are Independent Contractors, Not Employees
Supreme Court Nominee Is Likely a Good Pick for Employers
On January 31, 2017, President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the nearly year-long vacancy on the Supreme Court left by Justice Scalia. His employment decisions do not tend to draw dissent, bolstering the view that his opinions are not significant departures from Tenth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent.
Continue Reading Supreme Court Nominee Is Likely a Good Pick for Employers
Blue Laws May Require Extra Pay for Non-Exempt Retail Employees During Holidays
With Christmas falling on a Sunday this year, retailers should be mindful of state blue laws, which sometimes require premium pay to hourly employees working on Sundays or holidays. …
Continue Reading Blue Laws May Require Extra Pay for Non-Exempt Retail Employees During Holidays
EEOC Rules Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
In its recent decision in David Baldwin v. Dep’t of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133080 (July 15, 2015), the EEOC ruled that discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, despite the fact that Title VII does not explicitly include sexual orientation or gender identity in its list of protected bases.
Continue Reading EEOC Rules Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination